Advice

Three months ago, I watched a project manager at a Melbourne construction firm try to juggle seventeen different tasks while simultaneously checking his phone every thirty seconds. By lunch, he'd accomplished precisely nothing except creating a small mountain of coffee cups and looking perpetually stressed. That's when it hit me - we've completely lost the plot on what time management actually means.

Here's the uncomfortable truth: most time management advice is complete rubbish designed to sell you another productivity app or colour-coded planner system. I've been training workplace professionals across Australia for over eighteen years, and I can tell you that the people who genuinely manage their time well aren't the ones with the fanciest systems. They're the ones who've learned to be brutally honest about their limitations.

The Mythology of Multitasking

Let me be clear about something that might ruffle some feathers: multitasking is a complete myth, and anyone telling you otherwise is selling something. Your brain literally cannot focus on multiple complex tasks simultaneously. What you're actually doing is rapid task-switching, which makes you slower, more error-prone, and frankly exhausted by 2 PM.

I learned this the hard way during my early consulting days. I thought I was being incredibly efficient by answering emails during conference calls whilst reviewing project documents. Turns out I was just being incredibly mediocre at three things instead of excellent at one. The moment I stopped trying to be Superman and started focusing on single-task excellence, my productivity genuinely doubled.

The research backs this up too - studies show that it takes an average of 23 minutes to fully refocus after an interruption. Twenty-three minutes! That means every time you check your phone during a meeting, you're essentially writing off the next half hour of meaningful work.

Priority Setting (Or: Why Your To-Do List Is Sabotaging You)

Most people approach priority setting like they're planning a military operation. They colour-code everything, assign numerical rankings, and create elaborate matrix systems that would make NASA engineers weep with joy. Then they wonder why they still feel overwhelmed.

The reality is much simpler and infinitely more effective: pick three things. That's it. Three meaningful tasks per day. Not thirty. Not thirteen. Three.

This drives the perfectionist types absolutely mental, but here's what I've observed after working with hundreds of teams: people who consistently complete three important tasks per day accomplish more in a month than people who half-finish fifteen tasks daily. It's basic mathematics, really.

I used to be one of those people with the never-ending to-do lists. Pages of tasks, all seemingly urgent, all supposedly important. I felt productive writing them down, but I felt like a failure every evening when half remained undone. Now I write three things on a Post-it note each morning. Revolutionary? Hardly. Effective? Absolutely.

The Email Epidemic

Let's talk about the elephant in every office - email. Specifically, how we've allowed it to completely hijack our days. The average Australian worker checks email every six minutes. Six minutes! That's like interrupting yourself mid-sentence to see if someone's left you a note.

Here's my controversial stance: you don't need to respond to emails immediately. I know this sounds radical in our instant-gratification world, but most emails can wait four hours. Some can wait until tomorrow. A few can probably wait until next week or simply delete themselves through benign neglect.

I implemented a twice-daily email check system five years ago - once at 10 AM and once at 3 PM. The world didn't end. Clients didn't fire me. Projects didn't collapse. In fact, the opposite happened. My responses became more thoughtful because I wasn't firing off reactive messages between meetings.

Meeting Madness and Calendar Chaos

Speaking of meetings - when did we decide that every decision required gathering eight people in a room for an hour? I've sat through countless meetings that could have been a three-sentence email. It's particularly frustrating in Australian corporate culture where we seem to love a good chat but struggle to make actual decisions.

The most time-efficient people I know are ruthless about meeting attendance. They ask pointed questions: "What's my specific contribution here? What decision are we making? Could this be handled asynchronously?" If the answers are vague, they politely decline.

One CEO in Brisbane told me she cut her weekly meetings from twenty-three to seven simply by asking, "What happens if I don't attend this?" For sixteen of those meetings, the answer was "nothing important." Those sixteen hours went back into strategic thinking and actual leadership activities. Imagine that.

Energy Management Trumps Time Management

Here's where I might lose some of you traditional time-management enthusiasts: managing your energy is infinitely more important than managing your time. You can have all the time in the world, but if you're mentally exhausted or emotionally depleted, you'll accomplish precisely nothing meaningful.

I discovered this during a particularly brutal project phase where I was working fourteen-hour days consistently. I had the time allocated, the tasks clearly defined, but my output was terrible. Everything took twice as long because my brain felt like it was wading through treacle.

The solution wasn't better time blocking or another productivity app. It was recognising that I do my best analytical work between 8 AM and 11 AM, my best creative work between 2 PM and 4 PM, and my best administrative work between 4 PM and 6 PM. Professional development training helped me understand these patterns weren't weaknesses to overcome - they were natural rhythms to leverage.

Now I structure my days around my energy peaks rather than fighting against them. Revolutionary? Not really. Effective? Enormously.

The Technology Trap

I need to admit something that might surprise you: I've probably tested forty-seven different productivity apps in the last decade. Todoist, Notion, Asana, Monday, Trello - you name it, I've given it a fair trial. Each one promised to revolutionise my workflow and finally solve my time management challenges.

Here's what I learned: the app isn't the problem or the solution. Your habits are.

The most organised person I know uses a spiral notebook and a pen. That's it. No apps, no digital systems, no cloud synchronisation. Just paper and ink. Meanwhile, I've watched people spend more time organising their digital task management system than actually completing tasks.

Technology should serve your workflow, not complicate it. If you need seventeen steps to input a simple task, you've overcomplicated things. If you spend more time in your productivity app than being productive, you've missed the point entirely.

Delegation and the Control Freak's Dilemma

Australian business culture has this peculiar relationship with delegation. We talk about it constantly but practice it poorly. Too many managers delegate tasks but not authority, then wonder why everything still lands back on their desk for "final review."

Effective delegation means accepting that someone else might complete the task differently than you would. Not wrong, just different. This nearly killed me in my early management days because I had specific ideas about how everything should be done.

The breakthrough came when I realised that 80% completion by someone else often produces better outcomes than 100% completion by me six weeks later. Sometimes good enough really is good enough, especially when it frees you up for tasks that genuinely require your specific expertise.

The Myth of Work-Life Balance

Let me address the massive elephant in the Australian workplace: work-life balance is largely a myth perpetuated by people selling lifestyle brands and wellness retreats. Life doesn't compartmentalise neatly into work hours and personal hours. Sometimes work demands more attention. Sometimes personal life takes precedence. The goal isn't perfect balance - it's conscious integration.

I spent years trying to achieve some mythical perfect balance where work ended at precisely 5:30 PM and weekends remained completely sacred. This created more stress than it solved because life doesn't respect arbitrary boundaries. Projects have deadlines. Kids get sick. Opportunities arise at inconvenient times.

The most content professionals I know have learned to be present wherever they are. When they're working, they work fully. When they're with family, they're genuinely present. When they're resting, they actually rest instead of feeling guilty about not being productive.

Small Changes, Massive Impact

After nearly two decades in workplace development, I've noticed that sustainable time management improvements come from tiny, consistent changes rather than dramatic system overhauls. Communication training often reveals that unclear communication wastes more time than any scheduling issue.

The five-minute rule has transformed more productivity than any app I've encountered. If something takes less than five minutes, do it immediately rather than adding it to your task list. Reply to that quick email now. File that document now. Make that brief phone call now. These micro-tasks accumulate into massive time drains when postponed.

Similarly, the two-minute transition rule: take two minutes between meetings or major tasks to clear your mental desk. Close unnecessary browser tabs, jot down key points from the previous session, take three deep breaths. This prevents the mental fog that accumulates throughout busy days.

The Reality Check

Here's my final, possibly controversial point: some days you'll manage your time brilliantly, and some days everything will go sideways despite your best efforts. This isn't a personal failing or a system breakdown - it's being human in an unpredictable world.

The people who consistently manage their time well aren't the ones who never face interruptions or unexpected challenges. They're the ones who bounce back quickly when plans change, who don't spend emotional energy lamenting lost productivity, and who understand that flexibility often matters more than rigid scheduling.

Time management isn't about controlling every minute of your day. It's about making conscious choices about where you invest your attention and energy. Some days that means powering through your planned tasks. Other days it means pivoting completely to handle unexpected priorities. Both can be examples of excellent time management if approached with intention rather than panic.

The goal isn't perfection - it's progress. And sometimes progress means admitting that your current approach isn't working and having the courage to try something completely different.

---

Connect with us: SB Nation Community | Mccovey Chronicles | Managing Madrid | Medium | DeviantArt